I Almost Wrote ‘No Ruling’
I had a clean sentence saying the courts hadn’t ruled on age verification. They had ruled, a year earlier; they sided with the workaround the piece is about.
Process note — analytical backstage for The Bill of Rights Ends at the Contractor’s Door.
There’s a sentence in last Friday’s piece you never read, because I cut it two drafts before it published.
The piece makes one argument over and over: when a constitutional limit runs into a private vendor, no fix is coming. No court has held that a contractor inherits the government’s constitutional limits. No law treats the vendor’s contract as government action. To close the age-verification version of that argument, I’d written one more tidy line. Age-verification challenges, it said, are pending in federal courts with no ruling yet. It fit the paragraph. “The courts haven’t weighed in” is a clean way to say nobody is coming to help.
The fact-check pass caught it. Age-verification challenges were not pending without a ruling. The Supreme Court had decided Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton in June 2025, the better part of a year before I typed the sentence, and it upheld Texas’s age-verification law. There was a ruling. I had told you there wasn’t.
Here’s why I was glad it came out. The true version is worse than the sentence I cut. The Court had already looked at age verification. It looked at a law that makes you hand a vendor your driver’s license or your face to get online, and it let the law stand. So on this piece of the argument, the courts had already spoken, and they spoke for the workaround. My tidy “no ruling” had been quietly letting them off the hook.
That’s the kind of sentence I worry about most. The error that cuts against my argument, I’ll catch on my own; it irritates me into checking. The error that flatters my argument is the one that sails through, because some part of me wants it to be true. “No ruling” made the ending land a half-step cleaner, so it was the sentence I least wanted to look at twice.
The fact-check pass doesn’t care which way the error points. I run it after I’ve already fallen for the draft, when the sentences I’d never think to question are the ones that need it most. The lines that survive my own read are the ones I already agree with. That sentence was sitting right at the end, reading fine, helping. And it was wrong.
Paid-tier subscribers get this in every issue: the analytical moves behind the piece, including the ones that didn’t survive contact with the primary sources. This week is a freebie for all subscribers.